Example defined meanings I have interest in with little detail of what. Simply to show meanings of uncommon encounter with the usual knowledge I spend time recent looking into.
Before I begin, I should mention that parsemy can be addictive to use because it produces novel ideas and the novelty can be very interesting. This may cause you to want to innovate every day and cause an obsession with progressing the idea or exploring something new.
This in turn leads to massive amounts of collected knowledge that even you don't have the time to review and if on the computer will fill your storage space and perhaps even your desktop.
See the top left corner, that where the rest of the desktop overfilled with more files and if you look carefully you'll also find files called desktop which contain previous filled screens of files and second layers of files called desktop.
This is similar to my hardrive that contains my old computers entire files which is just as enumerous in desktop layers, with exclusion of the files I organized better.
For example photos on my computer is a maze of previous folders that I made for each layer of project that continued in new and exciting directions for years.
I do and don't remember the information, I remember a light summary of my path through it but not every hairsplitting idea and subject I explored. Further it grows dimmer with each year, much like my mostly buried or wiped highschool before I was 24 this year. As I produced sufficient information to build at least a 2000 page document containing the first three years or so.
Then a few months later I had written yet another 2000 or so page document and by that point I forgot the middle year for some reason and have little memory of what I did in the central length of blogs. As I only remember a sort of lengthy summary of how parsemy came to be and roughly an estimate preferred count of basic concepts I reused over that period.
While I also have numerous note books of more knowledge, it and the pile of scrap paper with notes on them is too huge to transfer to the internet. I also presume if I keep making new knowledge, I will eventually have to develop better methods of storage for information, which I foresaw in the early days that seem like forever ago, but were only two years ago.
Or in disorganized formats, throw out chunks of information by sorting it and deciding what is worth keeping. Online documents I simply store in a convenient hardrive of 400 GB and a computer with 1 TP of storage room.
This until it breaks and I have hopefully made a spare on the hardrive or a second one. I'm basically a hoarder of memetic subjects, because I like making eldritch levels of incomprehensible wisdom that doesn't actual get remembered if you read all of it.
It also may give me psychosis as I collapse the information stored in my brain in essential ideas as an innovated merged idea, that renders a eureka moment as a synthesis of the past simplified to store the information useful in my brain.
This is why making too much information is somewhat dangerous, but the result for the rest of the world is useful, because it can be sorted by people, for what they actually want or like. This is only if you produce endless subjects and scientific mass amounts of information. If you simply use it sparingly for making a new recipe to try, innovate your drawings or use it for a specific end, you aren't as likely to forget your life.
Compared to me, as someone who likes reason, sanity, spirit and emotion and those are all especially information rich subjects that my obsession with turns me into a haphazard creative genius with sever inabilities to remember to do anything else.
I only innovate and learn more knowledge about existence until it wipes my memory for the rush. I used to, but I don't play videogames, I've become obsessed with knowledge, but I also have no friends and gaming isn't productive. So I spend every day innovating and producing something instead.
This is also what I do while sleeping, resting,eating, on the bus, going on a walk or standing there smoking three cigarettes and walking back and forth on autopilot. All while my parents think I'm stressed or simply a prolific artist.
I'm not, walking soothes me while thinking about new things I'm doing or some random side tangent is the thought apart from the work on other things. The side tangent is for later when I work on other stuff.
However sometimes I also lay there in complete silence of mind, thinking nothing to rest. So use parsemy sparringly, or find a way to adapt to it that actually serves your end, because it is highly recommended you don't spend time on just about anything with it.
Instead focus on specifically what you like as subjects and hobbies, since the tool allows parsemy to generate from a pool of subjects that are of your liking, to create new links in those areas. If idea generators are designed by yourself to produce certain kinds of information for an activity, it helps keep you creative.
I myself get bored severely easily, so I spend most of my time innovating for the rush I get from the idea, that then produces a boredom, which I then plot twist the subject with or do a different one. This is among reasons for this topics creation.
I got bored of all the topics online at the time for having taking a whiff at all of them and enjoyed their knowledge basics at 16, then I made a link between atheism and theism and set off creating my own concept.
Under the belief that creating a new belief system was the way the world progresses, I decided to try and do just that. I then crashed from lack of interest and went and explored tragedy for a year because I was more interested in the concern for humanity and existentialism, this before fulfilling my goal of going beyond the known, by running out of interest in even the dark and futile.
But then again, I did want to go beyond the knowledge humanity knew and know something unknown that no one knew. I ended up figuring out how to know unknowns and define them instead.
So let us begin this lengthy discussion on parsemy and how I use it, with advise on your own usage. Another way to explain parsemy, is that if you use it sufficiently with what you like is it helps you find the ideas that help you improve something.
As essentially what you are willing to work on and want to improve while taking the time to work on it and using an idea generator to help come up with reasons, parsemy helps narrow down the steps of self success and practice to improve it.
So with the help of reasons to do so, you gain a faster capacity to develop innovative thought and so you become far more skilled in some better and improved concept. This in turn enables you to develop something you made that is unique and creative that you love.
The specific end of some topic, is accessed with the meanings that relate to it. So when using parsemy, while related to any form of idea and able to help with anything can be specified. So if you limit it to an idea and its internal pieces of meaning, it enables generating links in that area, this in turn helps you get creative in those domains past the typical level of patience and practice.
Since all I knew how to do when I started was drawing and writing, but I had a philosophy with that art and drawing, which I thought about and progressed with the idea of realism. That realism was what made it so complex, because I tried to get to the reality.
So I eventually built idea generators, to try to map the meaning between me and that end. This let me reach it far faster, since the basic idea generator I built was an idea I stumbled on myself while thinking all information was true.
This enabled me to form an understanding of knowledge and ideas itself. Which I used to explore it and so explore the worlds of meaning out there, this led to my various ideas and my progression inside a focused range of improvement and desired result.
But you can do this for just a highly specific subject, that enables you to narrow down its skills too.
It should be noted that a parallel science, is the hardest to achieve, for the matter you need for it must be figured out to build the technology and with a specific subset of modelling, you have to find it.
This is done with careful research, consideration and thought, that allows you to find a method sort of like how the alchemist experimented into a science and averence pareidolia modelling, experimented in thought with how to access its ideas on pareidolia and went with paper for it fitting quite well.
This took three to four years of absolutely constant work with maybe an hour or two break for pokemon. Pokemon was no longer played by the end, my time was preoccupied with one thing, the thinking and memetical hypothetical modelling, search and failures to acquire with prior knowledge of physics I made, to build up up to what I knew.
Especially because I started with science related ideas and couldn't access the tools, so I moved further away until I found the non-electrical hypothesis and failed firstly. Then gave up for the materials around me not being sufficient because spoons do not make good windmills when tied to a folder box.
Then wandered for another year or so, until I checked my resources collected and found mostly garbage. This at first I was almost in tears for not having any money from drug addiction, to buy anithing else but paper and art supplies. Then I went crazy into psychosis as soon as I realized I could use the garbage. I then spent two weeks in the hospital getting adhd pills and began working on my material portion and the results thus far are better then they were. It turned out thus far paper is the best for what I had known at the time and built up.
But the problem is another science or subject might not work like averence, so pareidolia useful materials was what I found and not necessarily the exact ingredients for another world. It is fun and thrill and stress inducing to build a new science if you were wondering, but I enjoyed it thus far. Its just a lot of work to do and its results depend on what you do and spend time on.
So let us begin my examples of idea generators, how I use them and types shown, then discuss some advice about building a science from what I experienced. As well as other tips then more advanced concepts that are less required for parsemy and more for my own subject created after. Since parsemy is also used in that set of topics in other specific manners, for help coming up with ideas, modelling and more in the subjects.
As we mentioned previously on the introduction, parsemy works like computer code and this is among why the above Icons can be viewed sort of like programs of meaning for the mind. Since the meanings are too long to remember as a whole the above example is interpreted different each time it is used and this enables the map of iconic meaning to be infinite and allows numerous experiences in the multiverse.
One can use this table above, or one will learn how to make them with parsemy that follows after.
Much of these concepts reflect pheyscaptical ideas, as ideas linked between physical, energetic, spacetime and perceptual concepts, because they are all relevant to world travel. This is why we use the above chememes as mental thought forms and physical features of reality unanimously in this discussion, but they have energetic and spatial features as well in following discussions.
An idea has an equal and distinct physical likeness to it that resembles the idea in matter instead.
Meaning in the above icons is often viewed as single word bit meanings of one word or definition based concepts. For example the central four meanings are science, magic, fear and art in this case.
These basic meanings of one word or definition are different in each icon, the center was made by inverting and adding the basic central four in extension outwards continuous, to form other concepts then the ones in the center.
This is using a cardinal, because a cardinal is a way to navigate worlds by transmutation of idea to another. The outer ring of icons called Chememes were made by referencing previous records. Inversion does not mean negative, it means opposites like all four elements of water, fire, earth and air. All four because in inversions case we view an opposite in a multi polar sense of many not two.
Cardinals exist in many forms but below I have listed the basics I use especially, they each have a mathematical like symbol assigned to them because parsemy works like math with cardinals. As the operators of meaning which are cardinals transmute meaning into another idea.
- Addition + : Synthesis of two meanings together so they form a new idea merged between.
- Separation # : Ideas linked separately, in a sentence of correlated meaning divided between.
- Inversion ! : Opposed thinking of concept listed in a diversity that has more then one opposite.
- Division % : Divided definition into component parts rearranged with another for new idea.
- Negation - : The removal of a meaning from another meaning of any kind, for the lack of it.
- Attach @ : The attachment of a meaning to another meaning in a position of changed effect.
Edit: After continuing to write I returned here to add these meanings but they aren't in the example of actual operations after this. Thus one can try using them yourself as practice.
- Cutting / : Using a meaning as a method of separating another meaning into parts between.
- Denom ? : Finding a common denominator between two meanings that is the same related.
Cardinals work somewhat like computer code where it comes to meaning assigned with them to operate and transmute new ideas. Since we use the meaning of a kind, with the operation and another meaning in some cases, which represent variables of a computer code operated instead in mind. Thus if we were to say that a wheel and a seat were attached, then we'd get a unicycle from the math.
However I will none the less provide an example of each in practice to show what they look like. However, keep in mind that meanings used and operated can be used again with the same operation to produce other meanings. Since the equations are only bias to the users mind and how they the user forms the meaning produced which is unlike number math where 1+1 always equals 2.
These are examples of ideas generated with memetic math equations, since these cardinals and their operations resemble math and are thus called memetic math. However, this is not the only way you can make a cardinal and one additional method sometimes used with this math is anything as an operation. Thus once one knows and understands the basic operations, you can make a rose bread the teapot, which is an operation of bread between the variables of rose and teapot.
Using bread as an operation is done by passing the variable through the operation as though it changes the variable instead of merge with the variable. As a result what you would get from the above equation is rose covered in breadcrumbs in the teapot. Since rose passed through bread would render a crumb covered rose into the teapot. It works as though you acted with the operation on the variable since the actions we do in life are operations, while variables are what we have in the action.
But beyond this one can also build cardinals in wholly different manners then math, by treating an operation as some kind of practice in actions emulated or done on paper with the mind. For example the following image is a cardinal that works very differently then meaning math:
It produced this image, but regrettably I forget the manner it was done, for its complex in nature and was used over a year ago during a writing binge I did where the ideas were for scalien geometry.
Cardinals are essentially an operation or set of operations on meaning or sets of meaning in a manner constructed as often some kind of symbolism that refers an action of operation. It allows a transmutation of meaning to ascertain a result of meaning that can be used for some other operational action or process.
Cardinals are actions that change the world or the meaning, because a cardinal can also be a physical motion or action just as much as mental. Since either are treated under universal equality of behavior by pareidolia of its effects. Mind and Matter have a visual fauna of form that acts the same way. One perceives ideas and matter as essentially a form that is operated by an action.
This is why the submachine, which is the natural simulation of reality as the default cause undefined of both mind and matter is accessed by meaning in the tendric exterior of ones mind. The tendric realm is not the ideas you have in a moment in the mind and rather the expanse of meanings next to them in an outer space of meaning that enables exploration by cardinal operation of idea.
In the same action of operation translated to the matter in the same end, one can then access the same idea in matter, by operating the same concepts to arrive at the same result with the same ingredients.
This is why the unaffiliated game you can play online, called little alchemy, is essentially how we create new ideas and new concepts of matter. It is a universal explanation to how nature forms and how we think because we are nature.
So because matter works the same way, by arrangement of action on matter and our actions on matter effect matter in similar ways, we create by the same process of arranging operations and think new ideas this way as well. This enables us to create concepts by expounding the idea we gain from it.
Expounding an idea means taking the basic idea you got from parsemy and expanding on it in written language to know more about it. This is because the basic idea is like a chememe, it represents a small view of a larger concept that must be zoomed into to see the concept in greater detail. For example if we combine the ideas we made previously with the memetic math we generated, we get the following topic of information.
This concept sounds odd and sounds surreal, but we can treat the idea like its got more knowledge to it by describing the information in more detail. For example the cycle body means the mouses motion about the exterior break of shape take, which is the edge of the world that allows the world its form by taking its shape. Thus we know the cycle body of the mouse as it moves in the space resembles the map of the beyond that we don't know from within the world.
We can thus attempt to figure out how to know this map, but this would require more expounding which we do by thinking about this specific subject in more detail. We would likely begin by trying to perceive the space outside the world and find the mouse there, but that method one would have to come up with themselves. Although one could use averence as a tool to do so, or with parsemy, build ones own personal methodology and practice for study. However you could just use it for a story and imagine a more distinct method for that story in some kind of theme.
However, the example was out of the ordinary to demonstrate the discovery capacity of parsemy.
Expounding the idea is how we gain more to do and more information on an idea we generate. This enables the world we create to explore to be unique and customized to the concept we develop. This is however done by the person themselves and so it require their own effort and creativity beyond the basic idea that enables the essential practice first required for knowing another world.
While the ideas can be taking for simply writing a story with them, the process of forming an idea also allows the possibility of exploring it in reality. This however requires the effort you put into it and depending on what that is, the process may be longer or shorter and easier or harder to achieve. None the less even exploring a world in a story is a fun hobby in just writing and parsemy lets you navigate worlds by generating the idea for that creative process.
When it comes to types of idea you can build the basics previously mentioned there are several basic topics you can choose from to create an idea. This can include science, magic, art and living, these are however some subjects that can be basic themes of creativity in practice and the chem table. Its shown again and contains numerous other topics not known beyond them, which must be interpreted. These allow creative spaces in many ways past the basic concepts we are familiar with.
While worlds can be mapped with parsemy and ideas can be found using the memetic math, the capacity to form ideas can be done in other manners then cardinals that we have shown. To show this as an example we can look firstly at other types of idea generators artists have made before. Such as the following:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Story_generator
Because little is known in reality elsewhere about them, we find that the methods known are distinctly different in practice then my mathematical method and here below is another example similar to my math, but using a computer program instead. It enables you to generate a story as it returns previous writings and allows you to come up with a continuous plot.
https://loscpi.itch.io/writers-grind
The natural method for forming ideas is often called thinking logically but also in my case called immaculate generation, which means born from no source of cause. Since we typically form ideas from sudden moments of eureka that don't relate to any source of generation we know, as an idea formed by chance in our mind or by logical thinking.
Always leading to another tangent, the idea that resembles an innovation. Its more difficult to come up with immaculate ideas of entire new subjects, but once a subject is defined it can be very easy to produce an idea about it. This is because one would have to depart from a subject into a wholly distinct field using only logic, to define another subject.
However, my other method for making new ideas is called the Lingal cardinal and it works very different from memetic math. Since it makes up a random word with no meaning then attempts to define it from scratch as a new concept unheard of.
The danger of this is that too many at once makes a difficult to communicate concept no one knows until they learn all the words. If its too long and too many new words at once, its impossible to grasp. Thus I spend more time using the links between known words, rather then often producing new ones. This slows the distance of innovation down so that it remains relevant to this reality in some reason of research.
As if you went to out of this world specifically, into something wholly unlike, its hard to understand. Sort of like how science is highly complex and requires much time learning. Currently this subject is shorter then sciences lessons on itself, because it can represent something like a specific field of knowledge on creativity and innovation as well as experience, for when it comes to worlds.
It allows you to quickly make a new idea for personal exploration, produces some discoveries worth time spent and the remainder of mass ideas can be either stored, sold, discarded, recycled or improved. This allows a sort of market of person produced ranges of new experiences, for those interested and leaves a leftover for others to explore.
Some things on my blog were never used again, if you find it interesting feel free to use it and feel free to improve it in your own manner beyond it.
Because its different from memetic math it maps another range of ideas, because memetic math creates links with known words and Lingal forms new words never heard of before. Thus I recommend use in sparring amount, but below are some examples of entirely new words.
These were made simply by the capacity for the human brain to construct a coherent definition from the inspired sounds of the word that we made up, this allows us to form immaculate like ideas by being inspired by the word itself.
However, immaculate like ideas can also form with inversion of ideas we know, since we know a concept and another concept reverse always exists in any class of category of meaning. This is called the extraculars of meaning, because the idea of a category in philosophy is a categorization of like things into one type of thing. For example types of horses contain white and black horses.
This is the same as categorical arrangements such as my often used grouping of sanity, reason, spirit and emotion, but also creativity, wisdom, faith and hope. However in the past on these blogs, creativity and hope were referred to as madness and fear, because psychology was intertwined with art and fear was used to come up with the moral and philosophical background of this concept stated at the top. It shifted as I tried to define my concept and what I liked especially for my science, which explores another aspect of those words.
Fear will be discussed later in more detail, because all parts that follow in this set of writings on my projects contain dangers and safety concerns when it comes to specific domains and portions. As when exploring a world there is a trend that an idea has a negative side of practice in it, which is always related somehow to the whole in good and bad light.
In an opinion of any kind from a philosophy, religion, science or art their is a negative side of conflict, since this allows the adventure and the methods of protection for the dweller of that world.
One might wonder what arts manner of self defense is, the answer is the story has a consequence on reality, the writer is in conflict with the opponent and the victory of the hero affects the reader creating the inspiration that inhibits the conflict from occurring for real. We will learn more about that later, since it relates to fear, the origins of parsemy and the end of this post.
Anyways, the reason I mention the extracular is because inversion allows you to access opposites in the categorical passage of that type. This is what the previously mentioned words are in this context, they represent opposite forces of meaning that create the whole world we know and are the original meanings of humanity, since they are the ones that were used first.
They are what brought about religion, art, science and politics, in the respective faith and spirit, creativity and sanity, wisdom and reason with inclusion also of hope and emotion for politics. This seems strange at first, but is because politics solves organization of the people and entertains the people with events and itself.
This below is an example of ideas outside of those basic words we know as the origins of the practices that create our entertainment and our knowledge of the world around us.
Notice that in the center we have our words as basic concepts in that category of linked likenesses, then as we invert the concepts around the central concepts, we gain other concepts that are similar but distinct to the ones in the center.
Expounding an idea means taking the basic idea you got from parsemy and expanding on it in written language to know more about it. This is because the basic idea is like a chememe, it represents a small view of a larger concept that must be zoomed into to see the concept in greater detail. For example if we combine the ideas we made previously with the memetic math we generated, we get the following topic of information.
The cycle body of the candy fed mouse in the exterior break of shape take, has the translated artifact of the border map of the beyond.
This concept sounds odd and sounds surreal, but we can treat the idea like its got more knowledge to it by describing the information in more detail. For example the cycle body means the mouses motion about the exterior break of shape take, which is the edge of the world that allows the world its form by taking its shape. Thus we know the cycle body of the mouse as it moves in the space resembles the map of the beyond that we don't know from within the world.
We can thus attempt to figure out how to know this map, but this would require more expounding which we do by thinking about this specific subject in more detail. We would likely begin by trying to perceive the space outside the world and find the mouse there, but that method one would have to come up with themselves. Although one could use averence as a tool to do so, or with parsemy, build ones own personal methodology and practice for study. However you could just use it for a story and imagine a more distinct method for that story in some kind of theme.
However, the example was out of the ordinary to demonstrate the discovery capacity of parsemy.
Expounding the idea is how we gain more to do and more information on an idea we generate. This enables the world we create to explore to be unique and customized to the concept we develop. This is however done by the person themselves and so it require their own effort and creativity beyond the basic idea that enables the essential practice first required for knowing another world.
While the ideas can be taking for simply writing a story with them, the process of forming an idea also allows the possibility of exploring it in reality. This however requires the effort you put into it and depending on what that is, the process may be longer or shorter and easier or harder to achieve. None the less even exploring a world in a story is a fun hobby in just writing and parsemy lets you navigate worlds by generating the idea for that creative process.
When it comes to types of idea you can build the basics previously mentioned there are several basic topics you can choose from to create an idea. This can include science, magic, art and living, these are however some subjects that can be basic themes of creativity in practice and the chem table. Its shown again and contains numerous other topics not known beyond them, which must be interpreted. These allow creative spaces in many ways past the basic concepts we are familiar with.
While worlds can be mapped with parsemy and ideas can be found using the memetic math, the capacity to form ideas can be done in other manners then cardinals that we have shown. To show this as an example we can look firstly at other types of idea generators artists have made before. Such as the following:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Story_generator
Because little is known in reality elsewhere about them, we find that the methods known are distinctly different in practice then my mathematical method and here below is another example similar to my math, but using a computer program instead. It enables you to generate a story as it returns previous writings and allows you to come up with a continuous plot.
https://loscpi.itch.io/writers-grind
The natural method for forming ideas is often called thinking logically but also in my case called immaculate generation, which means born from no source of cause. Since we typically form ideas from sudden moments of eureka that don't relate to any source of generation we know, as an idea formed by chance in our mind or by logical thinking.
Always leading to another tangent, the idea that resembles an innovation. Its more difficult to come up with immaculate ideas of entire new subjects, but once a subject is defined it can be very easy to produce an idea about it. This is because one would have to depart from a subject into a wholly distinct field using only logic, to define another subject.
However, my other method for making new ideas is called the Lingal cardinal and it works very different from memetic math. Since it makes up a random word with no meaning then attempts to define it from scratch as a new concept unheard of.
The danger of this is that too many at once makes a difficult to communicate concept no one knows until they learn all the words. If its too long and too many new words at once, its impossible to grasp. Thus I spend more time using the links between known words, rather then often producing new ones. This slows the distance of innovation down so that it remains relevant to this reality in some reason of research.
As if you went to out of this world specifically, into something wholly unlike, its hard to understand. Sort of like how science is highly complex and requires much time learning. Currently this subject is shorter then sciences lessons on itself, because it can represent something like a specific field of knowledge on creativity and innovation as well as experience, for when it comes to worlds.
It allows you to quickly make a new idea for personal exploration, produces some discoveries worth time spent and the remainder of mass ideas can be either stored, sold, discarded, recycled or improved. This allows a sort of market of person produced ranges of new experiences, for those interested and leaves a leftover for others to explore.
Some things on my blog were never used again, if you find it interesting feel free to use it and feel free to improve it in your own manner beyond it.
Because its different from memetic math it maps another range of ideas, because memetic math creates links with known words and Lingal forms new words never heard of before. Thus I recommend use in sparring amount, but below are some examples of entirely new words.
These were made simply by the capacity for the human brain to construct a coherent definition from the inspired sounds of the word that we made up, this allows us to form immaculate like ideas by being inspired by the word itself.
However, immaculate like ideas can also form with inversion of ideas we know, since we know a concept and another concept reverse always exists in any class of category of meaning. This is called the extraculars of meaning, because the idea of a category in philosophy is a categorization of like things into one type of thing. For example types of horses contain white and black horses.
This is the same as categorical arrangements such as my often used grouping of sanity, reason, spirit and emotion, but also creativity, wisdom, faith and hope. However in the past on these blogs, creativity and hope were referred to as madness and fear, because psychology was intertwined with art and fear was used to come up with the moral and philosophical background of this concept stated at the top. It shifted as I tried to define my concept and what I liked especially for my science, which explores another aspect of those words.
Fear will be discussed later in more detail, because all parts that follow in this set of writings on my projects contain dangers and safety concerns when it comes to specific domains and portions. As when exploring a world there is a trend that an idea has a negative side of practice in it, which is always related somehow to the whole in good and bad light.
In an opinion of any kind from a philosophy, religion, science or art their is a negative side of conflict, since this allows the adventure and the methods of protection for the dweller of that world.
One might wonder what arts manner of self defense is, the answer is the story has a consequence on reality, the writer is in conflict with the opponent and the victory of the hero affects the reader creating the inspiration that inhibits the conflict from occurring for real. We will learn more about that later, since it relates to fear, the origins of parsemy and the end of this post.
Anyways, the reason I mention the extracular is because inversion allows you to access opposites in the categorical passage of that type. This is what the previously mentioned words are in this context, they represent opposite forces of meaning that create the whole world we know and are the original meanings of humanity, since they are the ones that were used first.
They are what brought about religion, art, science and politics, in the respective faith and spirit, creativity and sanity, wisdom and reason with inclusion also of hope and emotion for politics. This seems strange at first, but is because politics solves organization of the people and entertains the people with events and itself.
This below is an example of ideas outside of those basic words we know as the origins of the practices that create our entertainment and our knowledge of the world around us.
| Noiria | Solidity | Protection | Discovery | Music | Popstar |
| Absence | Removal | Destruction | Ignorance | Symbolism | Iconic |
| Framing | Architecture | Creativity | Wisdom | Number | Weather |
| Statical | Confusion | Faith | Emotion | Comedy | Violence |
| Tragedy | Crisis | Skepticism | Vacuum | Mime | Hallucinate |
| Mediocre | Ecstasy | Silence | Expansion | Film | Virtual |
Notice that in the center we have our words as basic concepts in that category of linked likenesses, then as we invert the concepts around the central concepts, we gain other concepts that are similar but distinct to the ones in the center.
This is how I made the center of the chememe table, it enables the user to create a large spread of icons as the drawings representing words, or words as the meaning themselves for reference later. The above table is distinct from the icons I made previous, because doing the same process again can lead to considering other meaning in other cases instead.
This in turn can reveal what you didn't write last time. Further forgetting the icons renders a blank interpretation space of meaning, by single word defining of the icons after forgetting, it causes the icons to take on a multidimensional utility of innovation that is different every review of the icons.
By inverting the concepts I knew at the start to see the ones outside it I gain the knowledge of other subjects I can then intertwine and use for worlds. This is also how the majority of opinions and ideas we know on the planet formed, since someone disagreed with another and made something else,.
This in turn can reveal what you didn't write last time. Further forgetting the icons renders a blank interpretation space of meaning, by single word defining of the icons after forgetting, it causes the icons to take on a multidimensional utility of innovation that is different every review of the icons.
By inverting the concepts I knew at the start to see the ones outside it I gain the knowledge of other subjects I can then intertwine and use for worlds. This is also how the majority of opinions and ideas we know on the planet formed, since someone disagreed with another and made something else,.
This is why the ideas closer to the center are still familiar but as we approach the edge, we notice some specific ideas I added that have never been uttered before, because they were inversions of opinions by myself in the action of doing so to create an innovation.
While the opinions of people on the planet today seem in disharmony because no one agrees with the full list, the central words represent the basic assumptions of the full of averages on the planet, if we view creativity as psychological.
It is known that history progressed by the person who had a wiser idea, but history does not progress by replacement of idea. Instead ideas tend to add up together as larger clusters of interaction that in conditions of person reacting leads to an inversion and resulting new opinion. These opinions aren't in disagreement as they both exist and enable a way of life for someone in the worldview of that opinion or way of life. A mime may not be a scientist, but miming isn't false, just mime.
Often a cult forms based on an idea, especially one of knowledge or philosophy, this is because it trends to spirituality since progressively spirituality precedes and alchemy then a science, but in my case formed as a science parallel called averence, because I tested the thought of progressing a subject other then science so that it resembled scientific like structure using the likes of inversion.
As while I didn't plan to reach a parallel set of material practices with an unrelated philosophical base of wisdom I built up sufficiently to access a method of technology, I did because parsemy speeds up the progression of ideas compared to the typical single inversion of an idea.
Originally I accidentally confused scientific tests of physics, with observed facts about the nature of reality as it already was. This caused a lengthy exploration of pareidolia after I generated ideas with parsemy.
Thus because I had a method of generating infinite new inversions, synthesis and more, I was able to build up a sufficient information subset to equal sciences technological level.
This with the expansion of the above table able to be continued extensively, into further ideas farther away from the center with every step. If done it will eventually recede into wholly unknown subjects composed of the disagreement of focus with the other ones before them.
This with the expansion of the above table able to be continued extensively, into further ideas farther away from the center with every step. If done it will eventually recede into wholly unknown subjects composed of the disagreement of focus with the other ones before them.
Averence, is one step off that map, because I remained close to the world I knew for the majority of my current time spent on parsemy. Since I used a synthesis of Wisdom, Faith, Fear and Madness that later became Reason, Spirit, Emotion and Sanity because once I had a spirituality of god like persomnia that I followed. This until my alchemy and spirituality developed models and then an understanding that became Averence and Chancarts.
Once I had reached the models my spirituality had decreased into less use because it was now an entire subject matter, this is what happened to alchemy and science, it is why science is highly atheistic, because its gods became the science it practices. I still use mine to learn about their greater natures as beings of meaning and I explore focalized natures on that. However, I do sometimes go outside them for refreshed novelty and explore other concepts I incorporate as found useful.
As a result, the meanings you use for a cult as your gods are the meanings you prefer. If they had been progressed continuously in wisdom, instead of conflicted with a conspiracy unresolved or remained in lower knowledge. They progress to a subject of equal magnitude to a science in a density resembling a unique skill or trait you built up.
This is why my first blogs shows drawings of gods and speaks in spiritual knowledge especially, but by the time you reach this end it has become a highly complex modelling and material subject of science like complexity.
This is what happens when you continue to use parsemy, because it builds up a subject as long as you go beyond the concepts I did and what others have done, it produces an unlike topic that answers other ends then the subjects before them.
It did however have me pass through an entire historical progression of wisdom from the initial ideas back at 16, that led all the way to the first blog as an alchemy called Parsense, evolving slowly into an unrelated method of modelling matter.
Its not better then science either, it doesn't have the same capacity, so Averence as my first example of Parsemy used for higher complexity subjects, doesn't replace science, merely enables people to do something else with science or without in a way that only averence can do. This is why I follow with my opinion on conspiracy theories that I gained after starting with plenty.
This like a religion, which represents a story that recedes from its beginning of a philosophy and if given enough progressive energy expounds into a drive to its acquisition of a solution and an ability to use its philosophy with more skill. Religions have an answer to a conflict that they resolved somehow, they always provide some kind of experience and way of life. This was the original manner humans lived, it allows unity of grouped people and a basic sense of direction for its people.
This changed with alchemy, science's origin and itself after is still approaching the transmutation of lead into gold as the theory of everything or what waits after it in a philosophy of chemicals and prediction that was its base. It isn't focused on this anymore because its knowledge grew immense after many followers of its ideals. It developed its ideas over thousands of years of debate, to reach today with its computer. Its ideas can interrelate with cultures beliefs to form distinct worlds.
This is why the planet is closer to a small multiverse now then a single world, it enables different ways of life to exist for different people. World travel is different from science as a subject, because its a more personalized exploration that doesn't necessarily achieve the same results as a large religion or scientific body, because it depends on other peoples liking. However, you begin your path through it alone so you achieve your end on your own, whether others take part after or not.
Its better for yourself to firstly achieve the goal in some manner, then requiring everyone does.
This is why the planet is closer to a small multiverse now then a single world, it enables different ways of life to exist for different people. World travel is different from science as a subject, because its a more personalized exploration that doesn't necessarily achieve the same results as a large religion or scientific body, because it depends on other peoples liking. However, you begin your path through it alone so you achieve your end on your own, whether others take part after or not.
Its better for yourself to firstly achieve the goal in some manner, then requiring everyone does.
In similar sense my Averence spent an equal amount of energy in less time, because it could map the meaning of its concepts as it explored links between them and built up an inverse process of thought that escalated in a twofold manner. Firstly debate with others that I fully believed in criticism applied of what they argued was inaccurate, this until they had nothing to say except call me crazy.
This as well as my continued modification of the practice by my own criticism, addition of discoveries with parsemy and eventually a matter to use I found later then early because my practice was especially probability and pareidolia based. All this gave me enough velocity of wisdom grown and growing, to form a previously unheard type of object called a subcomp, that can only be accessed by the knowledge of my progression.
My objects are equivalent tools of measurement, calculation and affection to science, in another reality of concepts unrelated. Since I merely progressed a self explored tangent of inverted ideas specific until it had equalized with science, because I wanted to see if another subject could reach a scientific level of complexity.
This is mentioned here years ago, as the idea that another universes physics wouldn't look the same as ours meaning sciences, and point another direction of application of matter that would always miss the atom for something else. Unless someone entered that other universe through the space between and met science on the other side with a parallel approach of knowledge from a wholly other direction.
Initially I thought I had to go in the small direction, but I ended up using pareidolia and probability so its physics are above the atom in the macro scale, with models of physics yet explored. Thus, I built a computer from what we could perceive directly instead of what science tested and measured but couldn't see at all.
So while science and averence are both accurate methods of computing ideas for themselves as calculators of number and calculators of meaning. They if separate in distinct timelines, would never know each other in encounter for never studying the same part of matter, but both provide another experience we will see when it comes to how they view the world and allow similar effects, different by their physics distinct.
In that fact, we learn that history can take us one way but we miss another and parsemy allows us to find those other, that we wouldn't have done. They however, required myself to cross a primitive art, an existential crisis, a philosophical dream, a messiah of myself, an alchemy of spirit, a modelling of matter and a material of practice that I needed to go through consecutively.
This to reach a similar idea to science, because it mimicked the historical progression of humanity, with inclusion of a parallel middle age of fears of evil and started initially as just a story I was writing. I spent so much effort on it, because I had been lost in a parallel method of modelling matter since the start by simply eyes that functioned slightly different and couldn't track motion.
In the process of it, I learned too how to make more parallel sciences, because my philosophy was for worlds, instead of gold from lead, so I gained the parsemy as the alchemy of worlds for making more.
This is why it is a useful beginning tool for world travel, to help yourself get started exploring it in the depth I do at this time. While not perfectly like fiction, it is a method I figured out that helps bring that closer in other peoples methods and my own progressing to allow a better experience. This however depends on how many, how interested and how much work people, who I'll add may not all want to explore worlds takes part in it. So when doing world travel you work firstly alone.
With the help of others who did some and research on what they do with the idea of world travel.
Certain subreddits exist that have some ideas on it distinct from mine.
https://www.reddit.com/r/DimensionJumping/
This one is more basic, I also know less about its concepts and how powerful they actually are. It seems to me like a another magical practice but I haven't used it in much, because it does coincide with coincidences in my energy subject, so in what I grasp similar in nature between it and myself, I have managed some warps to other places of setting in sense of experiences in every day life. Its better used for personal problems and issues then alien concepts and ideas like mine.
Another will be shared in the next part only because it is a useful tool for myself and others that uses a similar and off shooting related concept to the above reddit.
Since it was shared on Dimension Jumping initially, but it allows locating precise synchronicity, which I can use with my concept I built. This concept is bigger and is significantly more unrelated and related to that basic concept, for being built on its own without knowing them firstly.
I came up with it in isolation, but the latter shown reddit also uses a similar concept called mind matter, which is quite similar to what I once called phentals, because I later simply changed it to mind matter without knowing he used that terminology. Since the word phental is a blend of physical and mental ideas and mind matter in this other persons concept is also using mind and matter together.
Just differently then myself, all three represent advances into shifting reality with the mind and matter. Which is one thing parsemy does, since it shifts your lack of skills to a larger success in skills you practice more efficiently over time.
However, I must mention advice on conspiracies before we continue with more on parsemy. Because one should truly think of their conspiracy as brought about by their own wisdom and not another's.
Because when working with parsemy, you create a world and that world has a negative as mentioned, that negative is also your world, if it actually respects itself and fixes itself. You can't reach a parallel science of distinct conception without passing through fears of what that world will bring about. This if taken as real to politics, instead of yourself's knowledge creating it, will not let you pass.
You can treat it like an adventure, but its wiser to act in your wisdom on your world and its fears, not politics and people around you related to that fear in perceived connections. Many are subconscious and my own was related especially to the core of what I created as an answer to it. It which serves as my path to solve, because the problem is also myself as my own self, just outwardly reflected.
It served as the way to reach the first world I modernized because the conflict is the dark side of my own spirituality, but because it taught me the way to get there by its nobility and its bane, by the answers to the conflicts it formed and resolved. I created in myself a concern for my world before I found the answer that gave me a closer path to the world I wanted.
So, while at first parsemy is easier with art that you use for a story and lets you explore your technical fantasy of worlds you imagined, the knowledge builds up and you discover more about that place, this in turn creates it, so you eventually face the fears from the story. In the edge of its solutions is its history that you traveled to reach the depth of itself you crossed.
The one who crosses the divide faces the fears, but the result of his journey is only the end he reached. This means the advice for my tools is my story in that world, the conflicts I answered need not be feared in others for the resolution of my work up until now is what is shared.
As the keys past the fears, that form often in a debates counter interpretation as what is incorrect about it, are also answered by what the person knows as what they do with primitives of mind made modern. This means the ideas you begin with when worked like a mill, make a deeper thread that grows, but to get to where your going you need a spirit that means your end as your passion.
This is why the first advice, is going with what you like, not what is anything.
Then consider it spiritually and begin with it creatively as a story, this before you continue past itself with an alchemy and matter. However, the one I made can give you an example and so can other religions and science, this helps relate to the world around you and keep it relevant.
I also did pass through the bible because in my youth I was raised with that so its ingrained in my psychology, some occultists recommend you use your upbringing with yourself in spirituality because it keeps you personally related and related to your family.
That's why and where themes originate as the four meanings I started with at 16 originally called the four horsemen at the start of my blogs, because I was in psychosis for that period of writing, it ended after the second blog or so.
As a result in the second blog I'm arguing that it's all things and everyone is right that we should all beleive everyone is right and that we should fully believe each other. Then suddenly halfway through I change my mind and say you don't have to think its infinity, believe everyone and you can even think its not an infinite multiverse, that its just what you think.
This was an important distinction I realized, because firstly thinking of everything and everyone beliefs and having them all in mind is too much, sometimes uncomfortable for the person including myself cause its too flat and boring and it erases culture. I also couldn't properly navigate ideas with parsemy until after I stopped trying to synthesize everyone opinion and instead focused solely on what interested myself. This was my paranoia talking until I realized past it and moved on.
However, I liked the idea of infinite knowledge, just not the requirement for knowing all of it, so I kept using parsemy for ideas, not the full and this led to the Hwall that is the idea of focusing on only what you enjoy.
This however morphed me into a dog deman, because I suddenly developed the liking to it, by creating the link with the meanings I liked, so it psychologically effected me severely and caused me to be permanently stuck in that bliss. Other then that, I worked on averence as what I came up with with the interesting parts of my previous work I could remember and after a few years got here.
That is why the next blog shows a meme about a cartoon dog and horse, does very little, then later we see me making a dog deman world unrelated to the previous concepts. This only thinking it was what I liked, but only in part as what I liked in my spirituality and my concepts is what ideas I always go back to, no matter what new ideas I find with parsemy.
Sanity, Reason, Spirit and Emotion are my favorite and better defined meanings and persomnia as teachers and gods, they continued among progress as my favorite meanings since then although the exact words changed because these ones were more accurate, with their links forming the rest of my work.
Another person with another spirituality or set of interests would travel parsemy in a wholly different way that would result in another entire concept of unrelated, scientific, spiritual or beyond manner. But that's simply what I think with my opinion and my idea I made, parsemy doesn't have to be used to progress an idea extensively and if I made a second science I wouldn't use memetic math for it.
So this subject merely represents an example of what you could do with the effort and attempt to progress your own ideas and philosophy to a level that equals the resemblance of a science or distinctly complex nature. My tools and concept was especially built for worlds, but its so complex that its hard to map something specific that may be unheard and only found in other directions.
Because memetic math is one cardinal and lingal is another, depending on the method you use the information you collect from it is distinct, because firstly memetic math operates meaning already existent, lingals use the semblance of words with no meaning to create a word and are somewhat dangerous for making too much gibberish sounding sentences.
A wholly other method, immaculate idea or otherwise could create a wholly distinct concept beyond the ones I can reach with parsemy as it is or as I add more capacity I think of, generate or create immaculately as I go, because I use all three together. Thus I innovate, generate and critic myself everyday to continue my highly specific path of practice, that does feature more then parsemy for exploring worlds, but requires this base. So please read all posts in this section.
Another persons culture can instead be relevant more importantly, this in turn renders a person with another concept that forms from meaning and art distinct. You also definitely don't have to use parsemy all the way up to a science, but overuse of it will progress yourself to a high density of knowledge. This is why these posts are so long.
One can also look into simply my constructed science parallel called averence and use that for what it is, but it takes the words I write to learn what I know on it. Its also a tool for parsemy that gives experiences beyond building a science out of excessive meanings constructed, so it can enable worlds in other ways.
Its recommended you start with the whole posts and take significant time before you decide to try making a parallel computer interface from something. I spent 4 years thinking and doing only the basics, which is the equivalent to when science had no computer or vehicle.
I also recommend you try parsemy as I suggest before running off to use a wholly different concept. I knew and learned again when inventing the subcomputers. I learned that something other the science, doesn't work or behave like it and it won't ever do exactly what only science or something else can do.
This means that it won't do a perfect equivalent of science only accessed by an equal sign that is like itself perfectly, instead if you went completely in a new direction with the basics of parsemy, or on your own without any help with just the idea of creating a complex concept, it won't be like this.
It will also leave you to be the judge of what it is and what it will do and no one will be able to give you advise on it, so you must deal with any question, concern or issue on your own. Myself and where I am in what I worked on, gives you at least slightly more advise and practice with the area then none at all, which while you might be interested, should be done slowly and with caution.
I threw myself into it at 16 and was depressed and existentially dark for a full year and a half, writing these, before I snapped out of it and went the opposite direction with the idea of fixing problems. This because I looked too deep for a 16 year old, scared myself and spent two to three years after trying to fix the damage I gave myself jumping into the dark unknowns with no prior closer ranges first.
The summary of what I came up with as a 16 year old trying to scare himself with eldritch ideas and innovation of his custom design is found on the second last blog in some detail. It is quite dark, is not suitable for children and some adults I showed parts too were repulsed in facial features, by the details I wrote at 16 that I didn't share only. That set of spirits is none the less merely the darker sides of sanity, reason, spirit and emotion.
Which I must add are the four corners of the planets meaning, nothing except what comes from those four exist. This until I made Averence out of a synthesis of what prior was similar, but was separated as religions, science, existential philosophy and styles of art and was divided by opinions and debate.
I made a fifth thing beyond and unknown to mankind, out of the four things that weren't in agreement simply because I happened to like all four at once. Partially so one could in least agree on something about each other.
The Averence subcomps are compatible with everyone like science in some way varied by necessity and use and people still don't have to like or agree with me on anything. Subcomps allow you to generate new ideas on any subject known to man current.
It can even give you an idea for a wholly new recipe out of your favorite ingredients for cooking. I may make more parallel sciences, or subjects after I get bored of working on this one and taking it farther, its mostly done however.
Parsemy allowed me to build a parallel history of progression, which receded from an art, to a philosophy prior to parsemy as its alchemy of worlds. This in turn became a science of modeled concepts after it, which as of current enables computing innovation and causing changes of potential and mass effect.
It was in its original practice of work, an exploration of a parallel timeline of meaning, which focused on world travel instead of other subjects, so is a world that explores worlds in a parallel set of practices that while similar to concepts known to mankind, is not approached in the same manner and used together instead of exclusively.
This part of the posts I am making on my whole concept reaches the knowledge of roughly its equivalent to art, philosophy and alchemy. Which is not a creative work of authorship but a mathematical form of generating worlds by mapped meaning.
This is mentioned, because theoretically if one spent every entire day working on the alchemy, after ones defined spirit, art and philosophy, one may be able to produce a science like concept using unrelated topics then material practice that has a computing capacity, in about 4 years without prior experience.
This only because parsemy speeds up the process of innovation by providing numerous ideas to work with, since the original computer called the analytical engine which was how I got the inspiration for building a non electrical computer initially, it was worked on for many years and computers were as well.
Because parsemy provides a method of gaining numerous ideas and averence gave me a way to model those ideas in a manner specific, I was able to narrow down overtime progressively better ways of doing computer like effects with paper and markers.
It was approached with the basic intent of making a separated modular based form of computing, that could enable calculations without electricity by user powered forms of energy, especially when it came to producing ideas on its own. Since this allows a way to model information without needing a computer to generate it. Further the goal was to allow a virtual environment like video games that was cheaper and distinct in certain ways from electrical computers since I wanted it for world travel.
As videogames and electrical computers are designed for predictive processing instead of what I needed, which was uncertain loading of information. More on that in the averence part.
The first computer was the hobby of two people alone and was non electrical, it was for their personal utility. While scientific computers, being highly complex when it comes to hardware took many years of grown research in several fields to be possible.
In the case that ones meanings of parsemy progress to a complex enough form, one can make another computer parallel with their knowledge to help them with their own tasks, but this takes the work on puts in and animation of graphics is hardest. That was the most difficult part of my paper based computer, since it wasn't easy to figure out and is still being improved with time.
This mostly to attempt to describe the requirements for achieving a computation interface of processing for a given science parallel, since each computational interface provides aid for its subject.
They are however only constructed with sufficient knowledge of some kind of modelling based subject, that models or comes to know reality in some aspect. The equivalent to a computer in occult is simpler, it is called a book. A book is an ancient computer, that is merely records of knowledge. It was partially the inspiration for my own, because I used to use documents to explore worlds and still do on occasion.
Beyond this point, I discuss some basic methods of building cardinals, then share more advanced concepts I use more explicitly for organizing ideas generated and worked on.
After I discuss the Submachine, which represents a more complex concept of memetic math, since memetic math is used in Averence as its form of scientific modelling like sciences more numeric form. After I spend time discussing more about scary ideas in relation to how to fix them if you look into them and why dark ideas aren't always as dark as they appear when used for the right ends.
Following this I share a basic bit of information and examples of how I built up another philosophy of matter and a parallel science called averence, but I also show three examples of these parallels to proove that more parallel sciences other then averence and science can exist. As well as some focus on the spirit of Averence as a technical single world of focus in the moment, that does its thing.
It depends however, since the concepts you come up with vary. Vary on how unlike the norms you make them and this can make the story or the conflict being resolved to change dramatically in solution or necessary concern. Different meanings have different substance of reality.
It also goes into some detail about how I got here from mostly a person who played and made videogames, read and wrote stories and learned then thought about philosophies from around the world. Which can explain the question of simply how I even got to an idea that generates infinite new information.
As, parsemy is infinite because mathematically adding bits of data like meaning or number together forms into new links that have a different value these combined are a distinct concept. Synthesizing meme makes one extra idea to combine with something, that can add more beyond the first added number.
Since most operations of meaning begin as a base of addition, including inversion since it adds through the process of opposites a likeness inverse to whatever it operated, the nature of meaning is arisal. Arisal is the idea that the world arose as simply the effect of original cause.
Meaning math works sort of like counting from one and adding another one after it, then another forever. Yet on earth their are already at least four basic subsets of meaning and those made numerous more extending concepts beyond it. This in turn is how our world started, but can include more that enable new experiences for the world, I specifically spent time on fictional experiences however.
None the less the concepts I've come up with are still in need of progress that is continuing, as parsemy helps map new ideas but the work is actually narrowing down ways to achieve an idea.
Finally I show a basic way to explore worlds with parsemy using story and provide some tools for it.
Initially I thought I had to go in the small direction, but I ended up using pareidolia and probability so its physics are above the atom in the macro scale, with models of physics yet explored. Thus, I built a computer from what we could perceive directly instead of what science tested and measured but couldn't see at all.
So while science and averence are both accurate methods of computing ideas for themselves as calculators of number and calculators of meaning. They if separate in distinct timelines, would never know each other in encounter for never studying the same part of matter, but both provide another experience we will see when it comes to how they view the world and allow similar effects, different by their physics distinct.
In that fact, we learn that history can take us one way but we miss another and parsemy allows us to find those other, that we wouldn't have done. They however, required myself to cross a primitive art, an existential crisis, a philosophical dream, a messiah of myself, an alchemy of spirit, a modelling of matter and a material of practice that I needed to go through consecutively.
This to reach a similar idea to science, because it mimicked the historical progression of humanity, with inclusion of a parallel middle age of fears of evil and started initially as just a story I was writing. I spent so much effort on it, because I had been lost in a parallel method of modelling matter since the start by simply eyes that functioned slightly different and couldn't track motion.
In the process of it, I learned too how to make more parallel sciences, because my philosophy was for worlds, instead of gold from lead, so I gained the parsemy as the alchemy of worlds for making more.
This is why it is a useful beginning tool for world travel, to help yourself get started exploring it in the depth I do at this time. While not perfectly like fiction, it is a method I figured out that helps bring that closer in other peoples methods and my own progressing to allow a better experience. This however depends on how many, how interested and how much work people, who I'll add may not all want to explore worlds takes part in it. So when doing world travel you work firstly alone.
With the help of others who did some and research on what they do with the idea of world travel.
Certain subreddits exist that have some ideas on it distinct from mine.
https://www.reddit.com/r/DimensionJumping/
This one is more basic, I also know less about its concepts and how powerful they actually are. It seems to me like a another magical practice but I haven't used it in much, because it does coincide with coincidences in my energy subject, so in what I grasp similar in nature between it and myself, I have managed some warps to other places of setting in sense of experiences in every day life. Its better used for personal problems and issues then alien concepts and ideas like mine.
Another will be shared in the next part only because it is a useful tool for myself and others that uses a similar and off shooting related concept to the above reddit.
Since it was shared on Dimension Jumping initially, but it allows locating precise synchronicity, which I can use with my concept I built. This concept is bigger and is significantly more unrelated and related to that basic concept, for being built on its own without knowing them firstly.
I came up with it in isolation, but the latter shown reddit also uses a similar concept called mind matter, which is quite similar to what I once called phentals, because I later simply changed it to mind matter without knowing he used that terminology. Since the word phental is a blend of physical and mental ideas and mind matter in this other persons concept is also using mind and matter together.
Just differently then myself, all three represent advances into shifting reality with the mind and matter. Which is one thing parsemy does, since it shifts your lack of skills to a larger success in skills you practice more efficiently over time.
However, I must mention advice on conspiracies before we continue with more on parsemy. Because one should truly think of their conspiracy as brought about by their own wisdom and not another's.
While at the beginning of my list of blogs I was paranoid about certain things in society, this blog set no longer ascribes to conspiracy theories in the same manner as the cliche online does. This is because I prefer conflict resolution by the self actions for themselves firstly, then those who listen to the concern. This over the expectation of the political domain because it isn't their responsibility but instead the inventor's and the people who act under an organized structure of support.
This stated because later when looking at fear, it tends to create conspiracy theories that can't be proven true or false like anything. This in turn can cause paranoia, that in a more formal context is less appropriate because it creates violence, compared to the like of my work with recycled matter and paper.
As an answer to the conspiracy such as the divide of opinions by my thought they all accurate represented the solution to the conflict. This which was my original paranoia eventually thought merely the result of not knowing we were all accurate definers of reality and not the result of an entity I used subconsciously for adventure.
Later, I reused the entity with the concern of a conflict in this case the garbage replacing the natural, is present in the discussion of the opinion or practice with a solution in presence. My work with recycled matter is an attempt to rectify the waste by firstly reuse.
Yet in the end, hopefully seeks better manners to return it to natural or created orders of being that allow our survival, instead of a progressing parallel universe of garbage replacing the planet as an uncontrolled open portal of alien geometry we ignore.
This represents the idea that a conspiracy theory is better shared with an answer that solves it without political contact at all, because politics only organizes what society is and society is the people. The people themselves represent the duty to improve society and this represents the idea that a scientist, should find answers to the worlds conflicts, but so should people and other opinions or practices.
Since in my case I'm not a scientist, rather a parsemist using averence of pareidolia probability modelling of existence, as a concept I defined myself. Both in the hopes of helping at the current moment two issues in the world. This in turn is why using this concept for exploring worlds does allow an adventure for yourself, because you help save the world from what you fear and only you know. More on how I do my world saving with nothing but a book later.
Because when working with parsemy, you create a world and that world has a negative as mentioned, that negative is also your world, if it actually respects itself and fixes itself. You can't reach a parallel science of distinct conception without passing through fears of what that world will bring about. This if taken as real to politics, instead of yourself's knowledge creating it, will not let you pass.
You can treat it like an adventure, but its wiser to act in your wisdom on your world and its fears, not politics and people around you related to that fear in perceived connections. Many are subconscious and my own was related especially to the core of what I created as an answer to it. It which serves as my path to solve, because the problem is also myself as my own self, just outwardly reflected.
It served as the way to reach the first world I modernized because the conflict is the dark side of my own spirituality, but because it taught me the way to get there by its nobility and its bane, by the answers to the conflicts it formed and resolved. I created in myself a concern for my world before I found the answer that gave me a closer path to the world I wanted.
So, while at first parsemy is easier with art that you use for a story and lets you explore your technical fantasy of worlds you imagined, the knowledge builds up and you discover more about that place, this in turn creates it, so you eventually face the fears from the story. In the edge of its solutions is its history that you traveled to reach the depth of itself you crossed.
The one who crosses the divide faces the fears, but the result of his journey is only the end he reached. This means the advice for my tools is my story in that world, the conflicts I answered need not be feared in others for the resolution of my work up until now is what is shared.
As the keys past the fears, that form often in a debates counter interpretation as what is incorrect about it, are also answered by what the person knows as what they do with primitives of mind made modern. This means the ideas you begin with when worked like a mill, make a deeper thread that grows, but to get to where your going you need a spirit that means your end as your passion.
This is why the first advice, is going with what you like, not what is anything.
Then consider it spiritually and begin with it creatively as a story, this before you continue past itself with an alchemy and matter. However, the one I made can give you an example and so can other religions and science, this helps relate to the world around you and keep it relevant.
I also did pass through the bible because in my youth I was raised with that so its ingrained in my psychology, some occultists recommend you use your upbringing with yourself in spirituality because it keeps you personally related and related to your family.
That's why and where themes originate as the four meanings I started with at 16 originally called the four horsemen at the start of my blogs, because I was in psychosis for that period of writing, it ended after the second blog or so.
As a result in the second blog I'm arguing that it's all things and everyone is right that we should all beleive everyone is right and that we should fully believe each other. Then suddenly halfway through I change my mind and say you don't have to think its infinity, believe everyone and you can even think its not an infinite multiverse, that its just what you think.
This was an important distinction I realized, because firstly thinking of everything and everyone beliefs and having them all in mind is too much, sometimes uncomfortable for the person including myself cause its too flat and boring and it erases culture. I also couldn't properly navigate ideas with parsemy until after I stopped trying to synthesize everyone opinion and instead focused solely on what interested myself. This was my paranoia talking until I realized past it and moved on.
However, I liked the idea of infinite knowledge, just not the requirement for knowing all of it, so I kept using parsemy for ideas, not the full and this led to the Hwall that is the idea of focusing on only what you enjoy.
This however morphed me into a dog deman, because I suddenly developed the liking to it, by creating the link with the meanings I liked, so it psychologically effected me severely and caused me to be permanently stuck in that bliss. Other then that, I worked on averence as what I came up with with the interesting parts of my previous work I could remember and after a few years got here.
That is why the next blog shows a meme about a cartoon dog and horse, does very little, then later we see me making a dog deman world unrelated to the previous concepts. This only thinking it was what I liked, but only in part as what I liked in my spirituality and my concepts is what ideas I always go back to, no matter what new ideas I find with parsemy.
Sanity, Reason, Spirit and Emotion are my favorite and better defined meanings and persomnia as teachers and gods, they continued among progress as my favorite meanings since then although the exact words changed because these ones were more accurate, with their links forming the rest of my work.
Another person with another spirituality or set of interests would travel parsemy in a wholly different way that would result in another entire concept of unrelated, scientific, spiritual or beyond manner. But that's simply what I think with my opinion and my idea I made, parsemy doesn't have to be used to progress an idea extensively and if I made a second science I wouldn't use memetic math for it.
So this subject merely represents an example of what you could do with the effort and attempt to progress your own ideas and philosophy to a level that equals the resemblance of a science or distinctly complex nature. My tools and concept was especially built for worlds, but its so complex that its hard to map something specific that may be unheard and only found in other directions.
Because memetic math is one cardinal and lingal is another, depending on the method you use the information you collect from it is distinct, because firstly memetic math operates meaning already existent, lingals use the semblance of words with no meaning to create a word and are somewhat dangerous for making too much gibberish sounding sentences.
A wholly other method, immaculate idea or otherwise could create a wholly distinct concept beyond the ones I can reach with parsemy as it is or as I add more capacity I think of, generate or create immaculately as I go, because I use all three together. Thus I innovate, generate and critic myself everyday to continue my highly specific path of practice, that does feature more then parsemy for exploring worlds, but requires this base. So please read all posts in this section.
Another persons culture can instead be relevant more importantly, this in turn renders a person with another concept that forms from meaning and art distinct. You also definitely don't have to use parsemy all the way up to a science, but overuse of it will progress yourself to a high density of knowledge. This is why these posts are so long.
One can also look into simply my constructed science parallel called averence and use that for what it is, but it takes the words I write to learn what I know on it. Its also a tool for parsemy that gives experiences beyond building a science out of excessive meanings constructed, so it can enable worlds in other ways.
Its recommended you start with the whole posts and take significant time before you decide to try making a parallel computer interface from something. I spent 4 years thinking and doing only the basics, which is the equivalent to when science had no computer or vehicle.
I also recommend you try parsemy as I suggest before running off to use a wholly different concept. I knew and learned again when inventing the subcomputers. I learned that something other the science, doesn't work or behave like it and it won't ever do exactly what only science or something else can do.
This means that it won't do a perfect equivalent of science only accessed by an equal sign that is like itself perfectly, instead if you went completely in a new direction with the basics of parsemy, or on your own without any help with just the idea of creating a complex concept, it won't be like this.
It will also leave you to be the judge of what it is and what it will do and no one will be able to give you advise on it, so you must deal with any question, concern or issue on your own. Myself and where I am in what I worked on, gives you at least slightly more advise and practice with the area then none at all, which while you might be interested, should be done slowly and with caution.
I threw myself into it at 16 and was depressed and existentially dark for a full year and a half, writing these, before I snapped out of it and went the opposite direction with the idea of fixing problems. This because I looked too deep for a 16 year old, scared myself and spent two to three years after trying to fix the damage I gave myself jumping into the dark unknowns with no prior closer ranges first.
The summary of what I came up with as a 16 year old trying to scare himself with eldritch ideas and innovation of his custom design is found on the second last blog in some detail. It is quite dark, is not suitable for children and some adults I showed parts too were repulsed in facial features, by the details I wrote at 16 that I didn't share only. That set of spirits is none the less merely the darker sides of sanity, reason, spirit and emotion.
Which I must add are the four corners of the planets meaning, nothing except what comes from those four exist. This until I made Averence out of a synthesis of what prior was similar, but was separated as religions, science, existential philosophy and styles of art and was divided by opinions and debate.
I made a fifth thing beyond and unknown to mankind, out of the four things that weren't in agreement simply because I happened to like all four at once. Partially so one could in least agree on something about each other.
The Averence subcomps are compatible with everyone like science in some way varied by necessity and use and people still don't have to like or agree with me on anything. Subcomps allow you to generate new ideas on any subject known to man current.
It can even give you an idea for a wholly new recipe out of your favorite ingredients for cooking. I may make more parallel sciences, or subjects after I get bored of working on this one and taking it farther, its mostly done however.
Parsemy allowed me to build a parallel history of progression, which receded from an art, to a philosophy prior to parsemy as its alchemy of worlds. This in turn became a science of modeled concepts after it, which as of current enables computing innovation and causing changes of potential and mass effect.
It was in its original practice of work, an exploration of a parallel timeline of meaning, which focused on world travel instead of other subjects, so is a world that explores worlds in a parallel set of practices that while similar to concepts known to mankind, is not approached in the same manner and used together instead of exclusively.
This part of the posts I am making on my whole concept reaches the knowledge of roughly its equivalent to art, philosophy and alchemy. Which is not a creative work of authorship but a mathematical form of generating worlds by mapped meaning.
This is mentioned, because theoretically if one spent every entire day working on the alchemy, after ones defined spirit, art and philosophy, one may be able to produce a science like concept using unrelated topics then material practice that has a computing capacity, in about 4 years without prior experience.
This only because parsemy speeds up the process of innovation by providing numerous ideas to work with, since the original computer called the analytical engine which was how I got the inspiration for building a non electrical computer initially, it was worked on for many years and computers were as well.
Because parsemy provides a method of gaining numerous ideas and averence gave me a way to model those ideas in a manner specific, I was able to narrow down overtime progressively better ways of doing computer like effects with paper and markers.
It was approached with the basic intent of making a separated modular based form of computing, that could enable calculations without electricity by user powered forms of energy, especially when it came to producing ideas on its own. Since this allows a way to model information without needing a computer to generate it. Further the goal was to allow a virtual environment like video games that was cheaper and distinct in certain ways from electrical computers since I wanted it for world travel.
As videogames and electrical computers are designed for predictive processing instead of what I needed, which was uncertain loading of information. More on that in the averence part.
The first computer was the hobby of two people alone and was non electrical, it was for their personal utility. While scientific computers, being highly complex when it comes to hardware took many years of grown research in several fields to be possible.
In the case that ones meanings of parsemy progress to a complex enough form, one can make another computer parallel with their knowledge to help them with their own tasks, but this takes the work on puts in and animation of graphics is hardest. That was the most difficult part of my paper based computer, since it wasn't easy to figure out and is still being improved with time.
This mostly to attempt to describe the requirements for achieving a computation interface of processing for a given science parallel, since each computational interface provides aid for its subject.
They are however only constructed with sufficient knowledge of some kind of modelling based subject, that models or comes to know reality in some aspect. The equivalent to a computer in occult is simpler, it is called a book. A book is an ancient computer, that is merely records of knowledge. It was partially the inspiration for my own, because I used to use documents to explore worlds and still do on occasion.
Beyond this point, I discuss some basic methods of building cardinals, then share more advanced concepts I use more explicitly for organizing ideas generated and worked on.
After I discuss the Submachine, which represents a more complex concept of memetic math, since memetic math is used in Averence as its form of scientific modelling like sciences more numeric form. After I spend time discussing more about scary ideas in relation to how to fix them if you look into them and why dark ideas aren't always as dark as they appear when used for the right ends.
Following this I share a basic bit of information and examples of how I built up another philosophy of matter and a parallel science called averence, but I also show three examples of these parallels to proove that more parallel sciences other then averence and science can exist. As well as some focus on the spirit of Averence as a technical single world of focus in the moment, that does its thing.
It depends however, since the concepts you come up with vary. Vary on how unlike the norms you make them and this can make the story or the conflict being resolved to change dramatically in solution or necessary concern. Different meanings have different substance of reality.
It also goes into some detail about how I got here from mostly a person who played and made videogames, read and wrote stories and learned then thought about philosophies from around the world. Which can explain the question of simply how I even got to an idea that generates infinite new information.
As, parsemy is infinite because mathematically adding bits of data like meaning or number together forms into new links that have a different value these combined are a distinct concept. Synthesizing meme makes one extra idea to combine with something, that can add more beyond the first added number.
Since most operations of meaning begin as a base of addition, including inversion since it adds through the process of opposites a likeness inverse to whatever it operated, the nature of meaning is arisal. Arisal is the idea that the world arose as simply the effect of original cause.
Meaning math works sort of like counting from one and adding another one after it, then another forever. Yet on earth their are already at least four basic subsets of meaning and those made numerous more extending concepts beyond it. This in turn is how our world started, but can include more that enable new experiences for the world, I specifically spent time on fictional experiences however.
None the less the concepts I've come up with are still in need of progress that is continuing, as parsemy helps map new ideas but the work is actually narrowing down ways to achieve an idea.
Finally I show a basic way to explore worlds with parsemy using story and provide some tools for it.
Thus let us begin by learning that cardinals such as meaning math, lingals or other forms of producing meaning about something or for something can be made in several basic ways. Since one can apply operators to previous forms of cardinal operation as a form of math itself. This works even for operators of meaning math, thus simply using meaning math for operators by focusing on that subset of information enables you to reach new forms of operation.
For example, the operators we looked at previously have been operated by other operators.
For example, the operators we looked at previously have been operated by other operators.
- Addition # Separation = Combining two ideas but also not, for a link in all three ideas.
- Inversion % Negation = Opposite negation of an idea in the meaning used as without it.
- Division / Attach = Attaching in position of meaning another meaning from a division.
- Cutting + Denom = Cutting the meaning in half with the denominator of the other idea.
Now, because their are numerous operators in meaning math specifically, one creates symbols for operations and uses the ones they prefer more often then others. However, advice is to change it up from addition of combining two meanings, because the ideas it produces while novel is limited.
Its limited because the meanings you form between two ideas only provides that range of type of idea, which while also among the easiest form of meaning to produce, does not reach another set of ideas. It can't produce inversion of ideas or the ideas of another operator because meaning is linked distinctly in different forms of operation, so an idea acquired from one cannot be found in another.
This is different from numeric math because meaning unlike arithmetic is multi linear and acts like a space of expanse in many directions of meaning, instead of a linear count from 1 to infinity. You could also actually use the idea of direction instead of operation as a cardinal, since any concept of meaning can be treated as a form of operation for producing meaning. This is another way to come up with a personal form of cardinal meaning production.
Since you can go to the left of the idea, if the left of the idea represents a chememe on a map of meaning you create. As in linking the idea your operating with that direction, produces a new idea.
This one is unique, since the directions can have numerous meanings to relate with ideas added by yourself. Similarly if you use operators of meaning math in distinct ways with visual thinking of an image and/or meanings of the visual drawn as interpreted in different creative ways, you can map meaning in numerous distinct manners that enable varied types of idea formation distinct.
Its limited because the meanings you form between two ideas only provides that range of type of idea, which while also among the easiest form of meaning to produce, does not reach another set of ideas. It can't produce inversion of ideas or the ideas of another operator because meaning is linked distinctly in different forms of operation, so an idea acquired from one cannot be found in another.
This is different from numeric math because meaning unlike arithmetic is multi linear and acts like a space of expanse in many directions of meaning, instead of a linear count from 1 to infinity. You could also actually use the idea of direction instead of operation as a cardinal, since any concept of meaning can be treated as a form of operation for producing meaning. This is another way to come up with a personal form of cardinal meaning production.
Since you can go to the left of the idea, if the left of the idea represents a chememe on a map of meaning you create. As in linking the idea your operating with that direction, produces a new idea.
This one is unique, since the directions can have numerous meanings to relate with ideas added by yourself. Similarly if you use operators of meaning math in distinct ways with visual thinking of an image and/or meanings of the visual drawn as interpreted in different creative ways, you can map meaning in numerous distinct manners that enable varied types of idea formation distinct.
Cardinals created or discovered by trying to find ways to form meaning types, using an idea you have can be made by building a formal operation that maps the ideas of that domain. Since you can find ways to build scenery by listing the basic variables that make a scenery and then apply meanings to those basic variables of scenery to create the equated scenery.
This is useful for world exploration since in having ways to faster produce a type of visual or data, it allows faster production of image or otherwise.
Further in complexity, if you divide the operators themselves into functions of meaning on how they operate the meaning, by describing the operator in detail of its transmutation. Then scramble those basic components into other types of operation or inter related links of transmute you can more finely produce distinct types of meaning generation.
However this is an advanced form closer linked to the deeper theory and study of specifically idea generators I made, which I studied once only in my travels. Since you can learn more about how idea generators as they have been explained here work. This is mentioned only because these are my keys to any future advancement of the knowledge of cardinals I actually make, but that you could too.
As depending on how meaning is inter related, the subject and tangent of organized ideas produced lead down paths as they are expounded and intermingled with new links of meaning after. These paths are called the tendric realm, for being the tendril like massive expanse of ideas you can form on distinct interrelated concepts of meaning.
These as the paragraphs of ideas you've collected but also found along the way. Depending on which direction you take something, with base knowledge or new knowledge, the worlds you come up with are distinct in ideas and practices.
Each forms an entirely original subset of idea, that in research and focus on what interests you and what you build up while exploring the knowledge types, grows into diversely improved manners of doing things.
Especially when you focus on a direction and try to figure out how to produce an effect with the knowledge you have, then trying to find in mind what is missing from the knowledge you haven't achieved.
This is how I came up with the current version of averence, by thinking about it over time and experimenting with the ideas I found in the area of the concept I had in mind as a computer with paper.
This I studied and spent a lengthy period of time trying to figure out the best way to make a calculation of meaning and an effect of probability with the paper that was better then before I had materials.
Its true that averence begins as a basic cardinal of meaning as it did when I started and simply allowed a randomized output, but it becomes more complex since it uses pareidolia patterns for visuals as aesthetic, substance and reference after I progressed the thinking beyond its origins.
This is how it all began at the beginning of the work to form a subcomp for computations of meaning as referential sources of idea as a physical cardinal of data for use in applications of tool as material physics inter related with the basic interfaces of cardinal equations. I needed to find something other then a table of writing for enabling an interface like a computer for calculating ideas.
However this is an advanced form closer linked to the deeper theory and study of specifically idea generators I made, which I studied once only in my travels. Since you can learn more about how idea generators as they have been explained here work. This is mentioned only because these are my keys to any future advancement of the knowledge of cardinals I actually make, but that you could too.
As depending on how meaning is inter related, the subject and tangent of organized ideas produced lead down paths as they are expounded and intermingled with new links of meaning after. These paths are called the tendric realm, for being the tendril like massive expanse of ideas you can form on distinct interrelated concepts of meaning.
These as the paragraphs of ideas you've collected but also found along the way. Depending on which direction you take something, with base knowledge or new knowledge, the worlds you come up with are distinct in ideas and practices.
Each forms an entirely original subset of idea, that in research and focus on what interests you and what you build up while exploring the knowledge types, grows into diversely improved manners of doing things.
Especially when you focus on a direction and try to figure out how to produce an effect with the knowledge you have, then trying to find in mind what is missing from the knowledge you haven't achieved.
This is how I came up with the current version of averence, by thinking about it over time and experimenting with the ideas I found in the area of the concept I had in mind as a computer with paper.
This I studied and spent a lengthy period of time trying to figure out the best way to make a calculation of meaning and an effect of probability with the paper that was better then before I had materials.
Its true that averence begins as a basic cardinal of meaning as it did when I started and simply allowed a randomized output, but it becomes more complex since it uses pareidolia patterns for visuals as aesthetic, substance and reference after I progressed the thinking beyond its origins.
This is how it all began at the beginning of the work to form a subcomp for computations of meaning as referential sources of idea as a physical cardinal of data for use in applications of tool as material physics inter related with the basic interfaces of cardinal equations. I needed to find something other then a table of writing for enabling an interface like a computer for calculating ideas.
Since the time was focused on subcomps and not the greater possibilities of what I could do beyond it. As I spent the time to gain that asset, before returning to parsemy prior for more capabilities and this led to the photoform effects of meaning mass.
Only after the concept I had concluded was made deeper by a link I discovered beyond the basic completed task I finished, since they happened to coincide with each other as an innovation formed with the discovery of patterns.
As such one way averence can be used is as a type of distinct cardinal for making ideas, but in a way that is not related to the original ideas here. However, averence can do more then cardinal generation, since it uses that base for its output and enables measurement and probability effects. As well as some potential for more complex material innovation with the tools. It is however still being researched, but needed a basic tool for interfaces first.
Beyond this post, I share more details on meaning math in the submachine, related here in parsemy used for the need of requiring meaning operations regarding its coded applications. This above is sufficient beyond less necessary advice for producing innovation of idea, but the results depend on success and effort to research a possibility especially starting from where you can act then as it improves in effort. This takes time and patience and continued effort for progress, it comes not the first day.
Beyond this post, I share more details on meaning math in the submachine, related here in parsemy used for the need of requiring meaning operations regarding its coded applications. This above is sufficient beyond less necessary advice for producing innovation of idea, but the results depend on success and effort to research a possibility especially starting from where you can act then as it improves in effort. This takes time and patience and continued effort for progress, it comes not the first day.
Bruh freal?
ReplyDelete