Atoms might not exist and the replication crisis is related.

 For those who don't know what the replication crisis is its the issue in social science and medicin especially where experiements can't be replicated and predictions are not recurrent for some reason. 

While I could blame social science's lack of reproduction to an inability to replicate human behavior for being more unpredictable then expected by similar to what I focus on in this small discource regarding medicine not being able to be replicated either. 

I beleive its the operation of the two that diversifies the components more broadly and this can be tested in any chemistry experiment but only if you use two different methods of grinding the materials into a powder. 

Because while most scientists believe atoms exist and are not a model of something unseen, I think that the micro and atomic are identical to the macroscopic in appearance, since the mind is comprised of those underlying appearances in the tiny scale of parts of the brain used to replicate the perceived physical world. 

This in turn means the quantum world and the macroscopic function the same, but only one is perceived directly and the other is so finely divided by grinding the particles diversely that they take on shapes that are neither the natural ones or the ones that another way of grinding make.

Infact for any scientist curious of what the quantum behaviors might be from a macroscopic angle I've already made a model using balance mass points and shape, which as a center of mass causes the motion behavior of literal spin to vary in diverse unpredictable ways including how it would adhere.

These above are the shapes of the standard model replicated at a macroscopic scale, the shape plus the heaviest point of mass inside them varies the resulting motion that particle or large scale object will do and while they behave different in scale by occupied space, both scales produce strange behaviors of motion if you build these shapes compared to only two typically seen in macroscopic objects. Infact the results of experiments with them managed to make quasi unpredictable motion types of balance.

Although their were issues with that specific object causing strange gravitational distortion I'm still unsure of in both if it exists or if it was just a mistaken impulse of the senses.

However below is a second parreleling and matching model, it takes the basics of the above model and applies the components of the matching balance, loss of balance and center of heaviest point, which it compares to proton, electron and neutron in an atom as matching of the behaviors of balance and counts manually the basic shapes you can make from a gombok all the way to more complex shapes.

They match the model of a hydrogen orbital model in very similar arrangement of shape when you remove those that are not technically possible as subparticle pairs of three bond, repel and neutral points which are as equivalent to particles while shaped visually as rough basic shapes of balance motion built off the gombok as the smallest example of a balance shape matching a hydrogen atom.

Since each shape and weight is heat binded by phase change and mixture of shape and some can't fit together because they literally can't fit, but others can fit because they lack the same shape caused by the seperation of the mass into a powder which medical equipment varied in labs for making substance can alter the result but so can a persons habits of consumption and activity over life they have do.

This means medication and people because they operate at different modes of behavior in such diverse motion ways as they walk or eat food, the result is a distinct microgeometry for each person and chemical set of powders, which only the similar operations of separation can replicate precisely.

My issue is that I have no idea how chemistry works, rather I've been experimenting with flat shapes like paper, foil, cellophane and plastic to render properties of behavior equally in an alternative way, since I have the basic motion capacity from the above model. But if someone more skilled in chemistry were to take these or improved models of balance and compare them to chemistry itself you may find a far more accurate prediction of atomic scale interaction.

Since these would represent a gimmick in perception I exploited to observe a superposition from the percieved compared to the unperceived that suggests the alteration of particles is identical to the alteration of an object we see, so cutting it differently cuts its non-identically the same way, this would lead to different machinery not equalling the same result if it does something differently.

Which is why a human being and medicine can fail to be replicated, for not being operated the same way in different cases of manipulation.